Geometric convergence
게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00068642663
Here, we state the equivalent formulations of the Geometric convergence
Group theoretic formulation (Hausdorff/Chabauty topology)
1. The geometric topology on Kleinian groups we mean giving the discrete subgroup of $\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ the Hausdorff topology as closed subsets.
- The sequence of closed subsets $\{Y_i\}$ tends to a closed subset $Z$ in Hausdorff topology of the collection of closed subsets means (1) For every $z\in Z$, there are $y_i\in Y_i$ such that $\lim_{i\to\infty} y_i = z$. (2) For every subsequence $Y_{i_j}$, and elements $y_{i_j}\in Y_{i_j}$, if $y_{i_j}\to z$ then $z\in Z$.
In other words, $\{\Gamma_i\}\to\Gamma$ geometrically if every element $\gamma\in\Gamma$ is the limit of a sequence $\{\gamma_i\in\Gamma_i\}$ and if every accumulation point of every sequence $\{\gamma_i\in\Gamma_i\}$ lies in $\Gamma$.
Rmk. It's known that the set of closed subsets is compact with Hausdorff topology. In particular, passing to a subsequence, one may always assume that a sequence of nonelementary Kleinian groups converges geometrically.
2. Equipping a hyperbolic 3-manifold $M$ with a unit orthonormal frame $\omega$ at a base point $p$ (called a base-frame), $M$ uniquely determines a corresponding Kleinian group without up to conjugacy condition by requiring that the covering projection
$$\pi:(\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})\to(\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})/\Gamma = (M,\omega)$$
sends the standard frame $\tilde{\omega}$ at the origin in $\Bbb H^3$ to $\omega$.
The framed hyperbolic 3-manifolds $(M_n,\omega_n) = (\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})/\Gamma_n$ converge geometrically to a geometric limit $(N,\omega) = (\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})/\Gamma_G$ if $\Gamma_n$ converges to $\Gamma_G$ in the geometric topology stated in 1, i.e,
-For each $\gamma\in\Gamma_G$ there are $\gamma_n\in\Gamma_n$ with $\gamma_n\to\gamma$.
-If elements $\gamma_{n_k}$ in a subsequence $\Gamma_{n_k}$ converges to $\gamma$, then $\gamma$ lies in $\Gamma_G$.
(intrinsic) Manifold formulation
3. $(M_n,\gamma_n)$ converges to $(N,\gamma)$ geometrically if for each smoothly embedded compact submanifold $K\subset N$ containing $\omega$, there are diffeomrophism (or quasi-isometries or biLipschitz) $\phi_n:K\to (M_n,\omega_n)$ so that $\phi_n(\omega) = \omega_n$ and so that $\phi_n$ converges to an isometry on $K$ in the $C^\infty$-topology.
Rmk. Note that one can formulate the above by saying that for $\epsilon>0$, there is a sequence of isometric embeddings $\beta_i: B_{\epsilon}(\phi_i(x))\to\Bbb H^3$ from $\epsilon$-ball around $\phi_i(x)\in M_i$ so that $\beta_i\circ\phi_i$ converges to an isometric embedding of some neighborhood of $x\in N$ into $\Bbb H^3$.
4. A sequence of Kleinain groups $\Gamma_i$ converges geometrically to the Kleinain groups $\Gamma_G$ if there exists a sequence $\{r_i,k_i\}$ and a sequence of maps $\tilde{h}_i:B_{r_i}(0)\subset\Bbb H^3\to\Bbb H^3$ such that the following holds:
(1) $r_i\to\infty$ and $k_i\to 1$ as $i\to\infty$;
(2) the map $\tilde{h}_i$ is a $k_i$-bi-Lipschitz diffeomorphism onto its image, $\tilde{h}_i(0) = 0$, and for every compact set $A\subset\Bbb H^3$, $\tilde{h}_i|_A$ is defined for large $i$ and converges to the identity in the $C^\infty$-topology; and
(3) $\tilde{h}_i$ descends to a map $h_i:Z_i = B_{r_i}(p_G)\to M_i = \Bbb H^3/\Gamma_i$ is a topological submanifold of $M_G$; moreover, $h_i$ is also a $k_i$-bi-Lipschitz diffeomorphism onto its image. Here, $p_G = \pi_G(0)$ where $\pi_G:\Bbb H^3\to M_G$.
Gromov-Hausdroff formulation
5. The sequence of discrete groups $\{G_n\}$ converges polyhedrally to the group $H$ if $H$ is a discrete and for some point $p\in\Bbb H^3$, the sequence of Dirichlet fundamental polyhedra $\{P(G_n)\}$ centered at $p$ converge to $P(H)$ for $H$, also centered at $p$, uniformly on compact subsets of $\Bbb H^3$. More precisely, given $r>0$, set
$$B_r = \{x\in\Bbb H^3:d(p,x)<r\}.$$
Define the truncated polyhedra $P_{n,r} = P(G_n)\cap B_r$ and $P_r = P(H)\cap B_r$. A truncated polyhedron $P_r$ has the property that its faces (i.e. the intersection with $B_r$ of the faces of $P$) are arranged in pairs according to the identification being made to form a relatively compact submanifold, bounded by the projection of $P\cap\partial B_r$. We say that this polyhedral converges if: Given $r$ sufficiently large, there exists $N = N(r)>0$ such that (i) to each face pairing transformation $h$ of $P_r$, there is a corresponds a face pairing transformation $g_n$ of $P_{n,r}$ for all $n\geq N$ such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}g_n = h$, and (ii) if $g_n$ is a face pairing transformation of $P_{n,r}$ then the limit $h$ of any convergent subsequence of $\{g_n\}$ is a face, edge or vertex pairing transformation of $P_r$.
In other words, each pair of faces of $P_r$ is the limit of a pair of faces of $\{P_{n,r}\}$ and each convergence subsequence of a sequence of face pairs of $\{P_{n,r}\}$ converges to a pair of faces, edges, or vertices of $P_r$.
A seuqnece $\{G_n\}$ of Kleinian groups converges geometrically to a nonelementary Kleinian group if and only if it converges polyhedrally to a nonelementary Kleinian group.
Rmk. It's necessary that one needs to assume the limit group nonelementary. It's possible that the geometric limit of nonelementary Kleinian group is an elementary Kleinian group.
6. A sequence $X_k$ of metric spaces converges to a metric space $X$ in a sense of Gromov-Hausdorff if it converges w.r.t. the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. Here, Gromov-Hausdorff means the following:
Let $X$ and $Y$ be metric spaces. A triple $(X',Y',Z)$ consisting of a metric space $Z$ and its two subsets $X'$ and $Y'$, which are isometric respectively to $X$ and $Y$, will be called a realization of the pair $(X,Y)$. We define the Gromov-Hausdorff distance:
$$d_{GH}(X,Y) = \inf\{r\in\Bbb R:\text{ there exists a realization }(X',Y',Z)\text{ of }(X,Y)\text{ such that }d_H(X'.Y')\leq r\}$$
where $d_H$ is a Hausdorff distance.
addendum. A sequence of representations $\varphi_n\in AH(\Gamma)$ converges algebraically to $\varphi\in AH(\Gamma)$ if $\lim_{n\to\infty}\varphi_n(\gamma) = \varphi(\gamma)$ for each $\gamma\in\Gamma$. This is a natural topology once we view $AH(\Gamma) = \mathrm{Hom}(\Gamma,\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C)/\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C\subset \mathrm{Hom}(\Gamma,\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C)//\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ as an algebraic variety.
Here, $\mathrm{Hom}$ we implicitly assume it's weakly type preserving but not necessary (strongly) type preserving.
In the manifold term, one can describe the algebraic convergence as follows: Element in $AH(\Gamma)$ can be thought as a homotopy equivalence (called the marking) $h:N\to M$ where $N$ is some fixed hyperbolic 3-manifold with $\pi_1(N) = \Gamma$ such that two elements $(M,h)$ and $(M',h')$ are equivalent if there is an isometry $\psi:M\to M'$ such that $\psi\circ h\simeq h'$. Note that this is equivalent to the discrete faithful representation of $\Gamma$ to $\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ by the $K(G,1)$-space property.
Under this view point, a sequence of marked manifolds $(M_i,h_i)$ converges algebraically to $(M,h)$ if there is a smooth homotopy equivalences $H_i: M\to M_i$ compatible with the marking that converges $C^\infty$ to local isometries on compact subsets of $M$.
It's noted that the algebraic convergence of $(M_i,h_i)$ to $(M,h)$ is guaranteed if there is a compact core $K$ of $M$ and a smooth homotopy equivalences $H_i:K\to M_i$ compatible with the markings and which are $L_i$-bilipschitz diffeomorphisms on $K$ with $L_i\to 1$.
Remark/Properties. 1. If $\rho_i:\Gamma\to\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ is a sequence of discrete faithful representation that converges algebraically to $\rho$ and geometrically to $\Gamma_G$, then $\rho(\Gamma) = \Gamma_A\subset\Gamma_G$ because by definition, $\Gamma_A$ consists of all convergence sequences $\rho_i(g)$ for fixed $g\in\Gamma$ whereas $\Gamma_G$ contains all convergence sequences of the form $\rho_i(g_i)$ for $g_i\in\Gamma$.
2. Although after passing to a subsequence, algebraically convergence sequence implies geometric convergence, geometric convergence itself does not imply algebraic convergence.
3. Suppose a sequence of discrete faithful representations $\rho_i:\Gamma\to\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ converge algebraically to $\rho$ and geometrically to $\Gamma_G$. Then there is not $\gamma\in\Gamma_G - \rho(\Gamma)$ with $\gamma^k\in\rho(\Gamma)$ for some $k\geq 2$. In particular, if the image $\rho(\Gamma)$ of the algebraic limit has finite index in the geometric limit $\Gamma_G$, then $\rho(\Gamma) = \Gamma_G$.
$(\because)$ Suppose there is $g\in\Gamma_G - \rho(\Gamma)$ with $g^k = \rho(\eta)$ for some $\eta\in\Gamma$ for $k\geq 2$. Since $g\in\Gamma_G$, there is a sequence $\gamma_i\in\Gamma_i$ that $\rho_i(\gamma_i)\to g$. Taking power $k$ gives
$$\lim_{i\to\infty}\rho_i(\gamma_i^k) = g^k = \rho(\eta) = \lim_{i\to\infty}\rho_i(\eta).$$
It can be shown (via nontrivial argument) that $\rho_i(\gamma_i^k) = \rho_i(\gamma)$ using the fact that $\rho_i$ converges algebraically to $\rho$. Since the representation is faithful, this implies $\gamma_i^k = \gamma$ for large $i$. It can be shown also that the set of roots $\gamma = \gamma_i^k$ is finite in general. Hence, after passing to a subsequence, $\gamma_i = \gamma_j$ for all $i,j$ so that $g\in\rho(\Gamma)$ which is a contradiction. $\square$
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
어느정도 성공하기도 했는데 과연 상방이 어딜지 궁금하네
-
착하게 살아야 생2 2개찍을때 하나라도 맞겠쥬
-
번호 속임인거 같긴한데 지인선 n제 22번 풀었어요 처음으로 22번 맞춘거라 뭔가...
-
왤케 싫지? 먼가 깔끔하지가 못해.. 정답을 맞춰도 뭔가 찝찝한기분.. 내가 어딘가 부족한걸텐데
-
몸살감기땜에 2
3일동안 제대로 공부를 못했다.. 현타 핵쎄게옴.
-
교육급여를 받을 정도로 경제적으로 파이널 실전 모의고사나 봉투 모의고사 문제집들을...
-
유전적 한계를 경험하고, 이상과 현실의 타협을 이뤄내기까지의 일련의 내적 갈등기간...
-
드4 적분부터 유기했다 다시하는데 ㄹㅇ 숨이 턱턱 막히는데 현우진의 차력쇼 보는느낌임
-
진짜 왜이러지
-
확통6에서 3정도까지 3년걸려 왔는데, 공부법 질문하나만 드립니다. 7
아시다시피 4점짜리부턴 거의 못풀어왔는데 이제 12번 정도까지 푸는거 같습니다...
-
경희대를 다나다가 현재 군대에 와서 2026 수능을 준비중입니다 올해는 그냥 최저...
-
나노버블을 활용한 폐수처리, 녹조제거에서 혁신적인 접근 1
요즘 폐수 처리 분야에서 나노버블 기술이 정말 화제가 되고 있죠. 폐수처리는 환경...
-
늦잠자고 훈련소에 있는 친구들이랑 전화하고 파스타 먹고 노래틀어놓고 침대에 누워서...
-
이해원 s1미적풀고왔는데 day 좀 지나니까 숨이 턱턱막히는데
-
오랜만에 다시 90점대를 찍었는데 허허 독서 10번 문제는 논리가 너무 억지 아닌가...
-
읽을 때 지문 표시 좀 과하게 함; 난 이게 각인 잘 돼서 이러는 거긴 한데 고칠 필요 있을까요
-
지인선 넘 어려워서 좀 더 쉬운엔제부터 하고 도전하려는데 문해전이 더 쉬운거...
-
학점 기준이라든가 어떤식으로 과선택하는지 알려주실 분 있나요 그리고 1학년동안...
-
사탐런 추천 6
사탐 두과목 백분위 95 나와야하는데 지금 시점에서 뭐가 제일 할 만 할까요?...
첫번째 댓글의 주인공이 되어보세요.