모든수험생성적상승목표 [509491] · MS 2017 · 쪽지

2025-07-16 11:08:02
조회수 79

26 06 31 영어 gpt 해설

게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00073848207

31. The human psychology and education communities (as well as some animal researchers!) have been against referring to “teaching” when describing social learning in animals, mainly because teaching implies a level of on the part of the model that is difficult to measure in animals. Nonetheless, there has been a movement within the animal cognition community to say that animals can, in fact, teach one another. For example, skilled ants engage in a behavior called tandem running, in which they touch their bodies to the body of a novice ant as they lay down chemical trails, presumably to assist the newcomer with route learning. Killer whales also repeat the same seal hunting technique in front of their offspring, sometimes without even killing the seal, leading researchers to ask why they would repeatedly catch and release a seal if they were not planning to eat it. Considering the amount of energy they’d have to expend, there would need to be a good reason, and that reason might be teaching. * presumably: 추측상 ** offspring: 자손 ① comfort ② courage ③ frustration ④ inventiveness ⑤ intentionality 


정답: ⑤ intentionality


? 근거가 되는 지문:

  • “teaching implies a level of ___ on the part of the model that is difficult to measure in animals.”
    → 여기서 빈칸은 모델(교사 역할을 하는 동물)이 의도를 가지고 일부러 가르치는 능력을 뜻합니다. 이는 의도성(intentionality)입니다.

  • 다양한 동물 연구 자들이 “teaching”이라고 부르기 꺼려하는 이유가 바로 의도성을 확신하기 어렵기 때문입니다. 즉, 동물이 뜻을 가지고 가르치려 하는 행동인지를 판단하기 어려워서, “teaching” 용어 사용을 꺼린다는 맥락입니다.

이로부터 정답은 ⑤ intentionality입니다.


0 XDK (+0)

  1. 유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.


  • 첫번째 댓글의 주인공이 되어보세요.