문제 퀄 평가좀
게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00068898278
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
설맞이 ->드릴 34 vs 드릴 34 ->설맞이 지금 드릴5 풀고있긴 함니다
-
현역,화작 거의 3~4 왔다리갔다리 목표는 원점수 80중반 정도임.. 미친국어 커리...
-
제3판교로 이전할 첨단 분야 대학 설명회에 12개 대학 참여 1
제3 판교 테크노밸리에 유치할 첨단학과 대학 설명회에 12개 대학이 참여해 관심을...
-
이감온 원래 구독하고 있어서 한달에 한번 오는데 저번주부터 국어 현강 다녀서 이감...
-
존재하긴 함? 진짜 두문제 남겨놓고 27분 가고 이러는데?
-
제가 보이시나요 3
유령을보셧군요 아차차
-
하루에 1개씩 풀려하는데 ㄱㅊ음?
-
문제 퀄 평가좀 3
--- Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific...
-
과자먹고싶다 2
시원한 캔맥 하나 까서 캬
-
ㅈㄱㄴ 수학 싹 풀어보게
-
마트같은곳 갔을때 매일 초코파이나 오예스 등등 새로운버젼이 나오면 예를들어 오예스...
-
그시간에 언매를 해도 깨어있고, 독서를 해도 깨어있고, 수학을 해도 깨어있는데 왜...
-
이투스 0
패스 가지고있는데 같이 쓰실분 많이 쓰지않음
-
ㅈㄱㄴ
-
작수 5등급 백분위 57 이었고 수학 트라우마 극복해보자 싶어서 올해 3월부터...
-
안 하던 공부를 시작하려니까 집중이라는 게 뭔지 잊어버린 느낌
-
퀄리티 어때용?
-
수학현강에 킁킁이 빌런있음. 그냥 킁..이 아니고 진짜 우렁참 ㅈㄴ시끄러움.....
-
시대인재 수학 0
확통러고 등급은 2후정도 되는데 남지현t하고 엄소연t중에 고민입니다. 누가 더 나을까요??
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ