Geometric convergence
게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00068642663
Here, we state the equivalent formulations of the Geometric convergence
Group theoretic formulation (Hausdorff/Chabauty topology)
1. The geometric topology on Kleinian groups we mean giving the discrete subgroup of $\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ the Hausdorff topology as closed subsets.
- The sequence of closed subsets $\{Y_i\}$ tends to a closed subset $Z$ in Hausdorff topology of the collection of closed subsets means (1) For every $z\in Z$, there are $y_i\in Y_i$ such that $\lim_{i\to\infty} y_i = z$. (2) For every subsequence $Y_{i_j}$, and elements $y_{i_j}\in Y_{i_j}$, if $y_{i_j}\to z$ then $z\in Z$.
In other words, $\{\Gamma_i\}\to\Gamma$ geometrically if every element $\gamma\in\Gamma$ is the limit of a sequence $\{\gamma_i\in\Gamma_i\}$ and if every accumulation point of every sequence $\{\gamma_i\in\Gamma_i\}$ lies in $\Gamma$.
Rmk. It's known that the set of closed subsets is compact with Hausdorff topology. In particular, passing to a subsequence, one may always assume that a sequence of nonelementary Kleinian groups converges geometrically.
2. Equipping a hyperbolic 3-manifold $M$ with a unit orthonormal frame $\omega$ at a base point $p$ (called a base-frame), $M$ uniquely determines a corresponding Kleinian group without up to conjugacy condition by requiring that the covering projection
$$\pi:(\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})\to(\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})/\Gamma = (M,\omega)$$
sends the standard frame $\tilde{\omega}$ at the origin in $\Bbb H^3$ to $\omega$.
The framed hyperbolic 3-manifolds $(M_n,\omega_n) = (\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})/\Gamma_n$ converge geometrically to a geometric limit $(N,\omega) = (\Bbb H^3,\tilde{\omega})/\Gamma_G$ if $\Gamma_n$ converges to $\Gamma_G$ in the geometric topology stated in 1, i.e,
-For each $\gamma\in\Gamma_G$ there are $\gamma_n\in\Gamma_n$ with $\gamma_n\to\gamma$.
-If elements $\gamma_{n_k}$ in a subsequence $\Gamma_{n_k}$ converges to $\gamma$, then $\gamma$ lies in $\Gamma_G$.
(intrinsic) Manifold formulation
3. $(M_n,\gamma_n)$ converges to $(N,\gamma)$ geometrically if for each smoothly embedded compact submanifold $K\subset N$ containing $\omega$, there are diffeomrophism (or quasi-isometries or biLipschitz) $\phi_n:K\to (M_n,\omega_n)$ so that $\phi_n(\omega) = \omega_n$ and so that $\phi_n$ converges to an isometry on $K$ in the $C^\infty$-topology.
Rmk. Note that one can formulate the above by saying that for $\epsilon>0$, there is a sequence of isometric embeddings $\beta_i: B_{\epsilon}(\phi_i(x))\to\Bbb H^3$ from $\epsilon$-ball around $\phi_i(x)\in M_i$ so that $\beta_i\circ\phi_i$ converges to an isometric embedding of some neighborhood of $x\in N$ into $\Bbb H^3$.
4. A sequence of Kleinain groups $\Gamma_i$ converges geometrically to the Kleinain groups $\Gamma_G$ if there exists a sequence $\{r_i,k_i\}$ and a sequence of maps $\tilde{h}_i:B_{r_i}(0)\subset\Bbb H^3\to\Bbb H^3$ such that the following holds:
(1) $r_i\to\infty$ and $k_i\to 1$ as $i\to\infty$;
(2) the map $\tilde{h}_i$ is a $k_i$-bi-Lipschitz diffeomorphism onto its image, $\tilde{h}_i(0) = 0$, and for every compact set $A\subset\Bbb H^3$, $\tilde{h}_i|_A$ is defined for large $i$ and converges to the identity in the $C^\infty$-topology; and
(3) $\tilde{h}_i$ descends to a map $h_i:Z_i = B_{r_i}(p_G)\to M_i = \Bbb H^3/\Gamma_i$ is a topological submanifold of $M_G$; moreover, $h_i$ is also a $k_i$-bi-Lipschitz diffeomorphism onto its image. Here, $p_G = \pi_G(0)$ where $\pi_G:\Bbb H^3\to M_G$.
Gromov-Hausdroff formulation
5. The sequence of discrete groups $\{G_n\}$ converges polyhedrally to the group $H$ if $H$ is a discrete and for some point $p\in\Bbb H^3$, the sequence of Dirichlet fundamental polyhedra $\{P(G_n)\}$ centered at $p$ converge to $P(H)$ for $H$, also centered at $p$, uniformly on compact subsets of $\Bbb H^3$. More precisely, given $r>0$, set
$$B_r = \{x\in\Bbb H^3:d(p,x)<r\}.$$
Define the truncated polyhedra $P_{n,r} = P(G_n)\cap B_r$ and $P_r = P(H)\cap B_r$. A truncated polyhedron $P_r$ has the property that its faces (i.e. the intersection with $B_r$ of the faces of $P$) are arranged in pairs according to the identification being made to form a relatively compact submanifold, bounded by the projection of $P\cap\partial B_r$. We say that this polyhedral converges if: Given $r$ sufficiently large, there exists $N = N(r)>0$ such that (i) to each face pairing transformation $h$ of $P_r$, there is a corresponds a face pairing transformation $g_n$ of $P_{n,r}$ for all $n\geq N$ such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}g_n = h$, and (ii) if $g_n$ is a face pairing transformation of $P_{n,r}$ then the limit $h$ of any convergent subsequence of $\{g_n\}$ is a face, edge or vertex pairing transformation of $P_r$.
In other words, each pair of faces of $P_r$ is the limit of a pair of faces of $\{P_{n,r}\}$ and each convergence subsequence of a sequence of face pairs of $\{P_{n,r}\}$ converges to a pair of faces, edges, or vertices of $P_r$.
A seuqnece $\{G_n\}$ of Kleinian groups converges geometrically to a nonelementary Kleinian group if and only if it converges polyhedrally to a nonelementary Kleinian group.
Rmk. It's necessary that one needs to assume the limit group nonelementary. It's possible that the geometric limit of nonelementary Kleinian group is an elementary Kleinian group.
6. A sequence $X_k$ of metric spaces converges to a metric space $X$ in a sense of Gromov-Hausdorff if it converges w.r.t. the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. Here, Gromov-Hausdorff means the following:
Let $X$ and $Y$ be metric spaces. A triple $(X',Y',Z)$ consisting of a metric space $Z$ and its two subsets $X'$ and $Y'$, which are isometric respectively to $X$ and $Y$, will be called a realization of the pair $(X,Y)$. We define the Gromov-Hausdorff distance:
$$d_{GH}(X,Y) = \inf\{r\in\Bbb R:\text{ there exists a realization }(X',Y',Z)\text{ of }(X,Y)\text{ such that }d_H(X'.Y')\leq r\}$$
where $d_H$ is a Hausdorff distance.
addendum. A sequence of representations $\varphi_n\in AH(\Gamma)$ converges algebraically to $\varphi\in AH(\Gamma)$ if $\lim_{n\to\infty}\varphi_n(\gamma) = \varphi(\gamma)$ for each $\gamma\in\Gamma$. This is a natural topology once we view $AH(\Gamma) = \mathrm{Hom}(\Gamma,\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C)/\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C\subset \mathrm{Hom}(\Gamma,\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C)//\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ as an algebraic variety.
Here, $\mathrm{Hom}$ we implicitly assume it's weakly type preserving but not necessary (strongly) type preserving.
In the manifold term, one can describe the algebraic convergence as follows: Element in $AH(\Gamma)$ can be thought as a homotopy equivalence (called the marking) $h:N\to M$ where $N$ is some fixed hyperbolic 3-manifold with $\pi_1(N) = \Gamma$ such that two elements $(M,h)$ and $(M',h')$ are equivalent if there is an isometry $\psi:M\to M'$ such that $\psi\circ h\simeq h'$. Note that this is equivalent to the discrete faithful representation of $\Gamma$ to $\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ by the $K(G,1)$-space property.
Under this view point, a sequence of marked manifolds $(M_i,h_i)$ converges algebraically to $(M,h)$ if there is a smooth homotopy equivalences $H_i: M\to M_i$ compatible with the marking that converges $C^\infty$ to local isometries on compact subsets of $M$.
It's noted that the algebraic convergence of $(M_i,h_i)$ to $(M,h)$ is guaranteed if there is a compact core $K$ of $M$ and a smooth homotopy equivalences $H_i:K\to M_i$ compatible with the markings and which are $L_i$-bilipschitz diffeomorphisms on $K$ with $L_i\to 1$.
Remark/Properties. 1. If $\rho_i:\Gamma\to\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ is a sequence of discrete faithful representation that converges algebraically to $\rho$ and geometrically to $\Gamma_G$, then $\rho(\Gamma) = \Gamma_A\subset\Gamma_G$ because by definition, $\Gamma_A$ consists of all convergence sequences $\rho_i(g)$ for fixed $g\in\Gamma$ whereas $\Gamma_G$ contains all convergence sequences of the form $\rho_i(g_i)$ for $g_i\in\Gamma$.
2. Although after passing to a subsequence, algebraically convergence sequence implies geometric convergence, geometric convergence itself does not imply algebraic convergence.
3. Suppose a sequence of discrete faithful representations $\rho_i:\Gamma\to\mathrm{PSL}_2\Bbb C$ converge algebraically to $\rho$ and geometrically to $\Gamma_G$. Then there is not $\gamma\in\Gamma_G - \rho(\Gamma)$ with $\gamma^k\in\rho(\Gamma)$ for some $k\geq 2$. In particular, if the image $\rho(\Gamma)$ of the algebraic limit has finite index in the geometric limit $\Gamma_G$, then $\rho(\Gamma) = \Gamma_G$.
$(\because)$ Suppose there is $g\in\Gamma_G - \rho(\Gamma)$ with $g^k = \rho(\eta)$ for some $\eta\in\Gamma$ for $k\geq 2$. Since $g\in\Gamma_G$, there is a sequence $\gamma_i\in\Gamma_i$ that $\rho_i(\gamma_i)\to g$. Taking power $k$ gives
$$\lim_{i\to\infty}\rho_i(\gamma_i^k) = g^k = \rho(\eta) = \lim_{i\to\infty}\rho_i(\eta).$$
It can be shown (via nontrivial argument) that $\rho_i(\gamma_i^k) = \rho_i(\gamma)$ using the fact that $\rho_i$ converges algebraically to $\rho$. Since the representation is faithful, this implies $\gamma_i^k = \gamma$ for large $i$. It can be shown also that the set of roots $\gamma = \gamma_i^k$ is finite in general. Hence, after passing to a subsequence, $\gamma_i = \gamma_j$ for all $i,j$ so that $g\in\rho(\Gamma)$ which is a contradiction. $\square$
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
미적 3점은 다 맞추고 4점 3개중에 0-1개정도 맞추는 실력인데 엔제 추천 부탁드립니다,,
-
고3 현역이고,, 낮1~높2 (97~94)정돈데 수시러라 겨울방학에 올오카 완강했고...
-
키스타입vs리로직 뭐할까여
-
집에서 와이파이가 버벅거리늨게 말이안됨
-
안녕하세요 썰! 입니다:) 저번에 첫 칼럼을 올렸는데 생각보다 많은 분들께서 좋게...
-
월간 조정식 풀고 있는데 대체 몇분컷 해야할지 모르겟스용… 1등급 맞을라면...
-
4등급이면 워밍업? 빌드업부터 하면 되나요
-
숭실대 문과는 어느정도 돼야 가나요??
-
무잔이다!! 1
녀석은 목을 베어도 죽지 않아!!
-
“메일을 다시 써 보라“ 입갤 이런 거까지 생각해주는 거 고맙긴 한데 진짜 인생 쉽지 않네
-
이거 굴곡없고 무게배분 적당하고 샤프심보호돼서 완전 펜돌리기 최적화 샤픈데
-
현 재수생이고 3~4등급이여서 기출 다시 풀고 분석할려는데 밑에 셋중에서 뭐가 괜찮을까요..?
-
이매진이 그렇게 좋다는데 상상도 오늘 사서 담주부터 올텐데... 매주승리도 나쁘진...
-
쌩독학 중인데 아직 개념 부족한 부분도 있고 기출도 안했어요ㅠ 정우정 쌤 개념기출...
-
국어 과외 5
하거나 받아보신 분 있나요 보통 국어 과외면 뭘 하나요…?
-
인강러들 대충 오늘은 20분정도 오바했는데 수업시작전얘기가 길어서 올라가는건...
-
근데 문제 많이 허술하네요. 어떻게 케이스도 안따지고 풀리게 k에서의 속도를 구하라고 하지…
-
. 2
매운 국물 닭발 먹고 싶네
-
정확하게 없나..??
-
사관학교 육군 여자 이과 국 85 영 69 수 84 합 238 최초합 가능한가요?
-
화학하는사람 을 본적이 없음 ㅠㅠㅠ
-
현 ㅈ반고 2학년입니다 뭣도모르고 공동교육과정으로 1학기때 수2 미적 기하 확통...
-
논리로 직접 계산해보기 전에 케이스를 확 줄일 수 있는 문제들이 많아서 이거...
-
과탐황분들 실모 뺑뺑이 vs n제 더 풀기 뭐가 나은가요 2
프로모터 캔버스 다했고 8월 2주? 중으로 어댑터도 끝날거같은데 8월부터 무한 실모...
-
"좋은 생기부를 쓰려면 어떻게 써야 하나요?" 제가 컨설턴트 일을 할 때 가장...
-
뭘 더 해야 이감 60점대를 벗어날 수 있을까...
-
여사친이 준 샤프 vs 7만원짜리 샤프 님들이라면 ㅁ ㅓ 씀?
-
진짜 다른 문제들은 못풀더라도 어찌저찌 시도는 해보는데 얘네는 진짜 걍 대가리가...
-
1년반 준비하고 내년 수능 준비합니다.국어 선택과목이 문제인데요.현역 때 국수...
-
머가조아
-
목표로 하는 직업이나 하고 싶은 일 같은 거 계신가요
-
올6평2개 이감오늘풀고다맞았네 드디어문학공부완성 현역때공부좀할걸
-
수특 강e분은 꾸준히 보고 있어요(꺼먹은 것도 많음) 그리고 e매진도 계속 안...
-
국어 92 미적 50 영어 88 .
-
오늘 수학 뉴런같은 실전개념 정리한 필기노트 첨으로 받아서 봤는데 분명 내가 문제에...
-
술먹으셔서 0
자꾸 괴상한 게시글을 쓰시는 거였군
-
난 지하철,버스탈 때 일부러 존예옆에 앉음 그러면 알아서 비켜줘서 쩍벌로 편하게 앉을 수 있음
-
이때 심리도 다 다름 3: 그래도 이번엔 각잡고 풀어볼까? 4: 각잡고 풀어볼까?...
-
원래 안이랫잖아
-
천재의 대명사 아인슈타인 VS 두뇌가 인간의 것이 아니라는 말이 있을 정도의...
-
요즘 실모 많이 치면서 이런 생각 드는 거 저뿐인가영.. 0
시대 과제 다 해가려면 (단과 두 개) 거의 1일 1실몬데 이러니까 시험때 긴장감이...
-
후 중간에 푹쉬고 놀았암 친구 만나서 그래서 공부 마지막으로 함 10h완
-
시대 단과 다니는데 서바이벌 치고난 뒤에 성적? 부엉이포스트 통해서 보라...
-
지독하다 으악 이녀석!!
-
수학 시대인재 숏컷이랑 강사별(강기원,김현우쌤) 과제들 가격이 어떻게 되나요?
-
ㅈㄴ 웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 바이든 드립은 어디나 있구나
-
오늘 하루 헛산거 같네요 ㅜㅜ 머리는 멍하고 ㅜㅜ 오늘은 일찍 자야지
-
58 100 1 99 96 (아마) 모의지원에 이런 성적 있었음
-
6모 백분위 찍맞 없이 98이었는데 요즘 서바치면서 깨지다가 사관 보니까 상대적으로...
첫번째 댓글의 주인공이 되어보세요.