확신이 없는 객관식 답 바꿔야할까?
게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00061056527
밑에 영어는 책에서 퍼온 건데 좀 더 자세한 얘기가 있어요
결론하고 알아두면 좋아보이는 부분만 제가 볼드체로 바꿨어요
Across various surveys, large proportions—between 68% and 100%—of college students say that changing their initial answers on a test won’t improve their score. About three fourths say that chang- ing their answers will actually lower their score (Ballance, 1977; Benjamin, Cavell, & Shallenberger, 1984). This myth—sometimes called the “first instinct fallacy”—isn’t limited to undergraduates. In one study, among professors who gave their college students advice about changing answers on tests, 63% told them not to do so because it would tend to lower their scores. Among science and liberal arts professors, only 5–6% said that changing answers would tend to increase students’ scores; the per- centage among education professors was 30% (Benjamin et al., 1984). What’s more, scores of websites, including those designed to provide students with test-taking advice, inform readers that changing their initial answers is a bad strategy and encourage them to trust their first hunches. One website tells students, “Don’t keep on changing your answer—usually your first choice is the right one, unless you misread the question” (TestTakingTips.com) and another advises them to “Trust your first hunch. When you answer a question, go with your first hunch —don’t change your answer unless you’re absolutely sure you’re right” (Tomahawk Elementary School). Another goes further, even citing research support for this belief: “Be wary of changing your mind: There is evidence to suggest that students more frequently change right answers to wrong ones than wrong answers to right ones” (Fetzner Student-Athlete Academic Center).
What do the scientific findings actually say? With over 3 million high school students taking the SAT and ACT (interestingly, in the case of both tests the letters don’t stand for anything) each year, this question is hardly trivial. In fact, the research evidence is surprisingly consistent, and it points to the opposite conclusion presented on these websites (Benjamin et al., 1984; Geiger, 1996; Skinner, 1983; Waddell & Blankenship, 1994). More than 60 studies lead to essentially the same verdict: When students change answers on multiple-choice tests (typically as judged by their erasures or cross-outs of earlier answers), they’re more likely to change from a wrong to a right answer than from a right to a wrong answer. For each point that students lose when changing from a right to a wrong answer, they gain between two and three points on average in changing from a wrong to a right answer (Benjamin et al., 1984; Foote & Belinky, 1972; Geiger, 1996). In addi- tion, students who change more answers tend to receive higher test scores than other students, although this finding is only correlational (see Intro- duction, p. 13) and may reflect the fact that frequent answer-changers are higher test performers to begin with (Geiger, 1997; Friedman & Cook, 1995). All of these conclusions hold not merely for multiple choice tests given in classes, but for standardized tests like the SAT and Graduate Record Exam (GRE).
Admittedly, there are two qualifications to the “when in doubt, change your answer” strategy. First, research suggests that students shouldn’t change their answer if they’re merely guessing this answer might be wrong; changing one’s answer is beneficial only when students have a good reason to suspect their answer is wrong (Shatz & Best, 1987; Skinner,1983). Second, there’s some evidence that students who do poorly on multiple choice tests may benefit less from changing their answers than other students (Best, 1979). So these students may want to change their answers only when they’re fairly certain these answers are wrong.
There’s surprisingly little research addressing the question of why students believe that changing their initial answers is usually a bad idea. But three likely explanations come to mind. First, as we’ve seen, most professors who give their students advice about changing their answers advise them not to do so (Benjamin et al., 1984). So this mistaken belief is probably spread partly by word-of-mouth (Higham & Gerrard, 2005). Second, research suggests that students are more likely to remember items whose answers they changed from right to wrong than those they changed from wrong to right (Bath, 1967; Ferguson, Kreiter, Peterson, Rowat, & Elliott, 2002). Because the bitter taste of incorrect decisions lingers longer than the memory of correct decisions (“Why on earth did I change that answer? I had it right the first time”), our test-taking mistakes typically stick in our minds. As a consequence, a phenomenon called the availability heuristic may lead students to overestimate the risk of committing errors when changing answers. As we learned earlier (see Introduction, p. 15), a heuristic is a mental shortcut or rule of thumb. When we use the availability heuristic, we’re estimating the likelihood of an event by how easily it comes to our minds. Indeed, research shows that students who change right answers to wrong answers recall these decisions much better than do students who change wrong answers to right answers, largely because the former changes create a more last- ing emotional impact (Kruger, Wirtz, & Miller, 2005). Third, research indicates that most students overestimate how many answers they get right on multiple choice tests (Pressley & Ghatala, 1988), so they may assume that changing answers is likely to lower their score.
So to cut to the bottom line: When in doubt, we’re usually best not trusting our instincts. After all, our first hunches are just that—hunches. If we have a good reason to believe we’re wrong, we should go with our head, not our gut, and turn that pencil upside-down.
50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology Shattering Widespread Misconceptions about Human Behavior by Scott O. Lilienfeld Steven Jay Lynn John Ruscio Barry L. Beyerstein
결론: 단순히 찝찝하다는 느낌을 넘어섰을 때 바꿔야 좋다.
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
저는 도태한남을 맞고있는!
-
김기현이 오답노트하지말고 그먕 그시간에 문제를 더 풀어서 얻어갈껄 얻어가라는데...
-
ㅇㅇ....
-
ㅇㅇ.. 어떻게 걸지 ㅜㅜ
-
Viva la vida를 트네
-
서울대->한의대보다 한의대->서울대 이게 더 쉬워보여서 일단 오긴했음ㅋㅋㅋ 적응해야만한다…
-
과외하느라 깜빡했네 ㅋㅋㅋ
-
햄부기먹어야징 흐흐흐
-
백으로는 누구나 승률 높음
-
지금 엄소연쌤 듣는데 이것도 만족하곤 있어요 근데 수학을 엄청 잘하는 편은 아니고...
-
[고려대학교 25학번 합격] 합격자를 위한 고려대 25 단톡방을 소개합니다. 0
고려대 25학번 합격자를 위한 고려대 클루x노크 오픈채팅방을 소개합니다. 24학번...
-
하..
-
반가워요! 0
오르비언 분들!
-
수학 문풀량 0
수능 끝나고 지금까지 설맞이 수1(반 정도 풀고 드랍), 수2 미적 쉬사준킬 수1...
-
세지지1은 4명 이상인듯?
-
수학 84~96진동하는 사람 한완수 추천.....?? 7
평균적으론 백분위 98인데 운나쁘면 1컷도 받고 운 좋아서 시험지 잘맞으면 만점도...
-
화요일까진 가정사 이슈로 잠시 휴식
-
알못들이 이상한데서 지적우월감느끼면서 지적하기에 최적화된거같음 방금 조정식쌤이...
-
기이현상 0
화작->문학->비문학 순으로 품 화작 10분 문학 30분 비문학 35분 총...
-
혼토노 코에오 히비카세테요 호라 미나이 후리시테이테모 타시카니 소코니 이마모 소코니...
-
예전 올비선생님이셨던 미천한수학자님 황금손님은 아직강사님 하고계신가요??? 0
그남 그냥 궁금하네요
-
생2 1타 백호쌤인걸로아는데 생1은 누군가요???
-
내 지능 수준 1
자퇴하러 버스타는데 버스카드안갖고와서 집다시갔다옴
-
걍 살아도 될듯
-
지금 한 5점대일텐데 4점대까진 올리려 해봐야하나...?
-
이왜진
-
밥먹으러 와써요 2
-
갑질 의혹 벗고 돌아온 강형욱 "너무 기뻐…뭐든 다 해드리겠다" 1
직원 갑질 의혹으로 경찰 조사를 받았던 반려견 훈련사 강형욱이 무혐의 처분 뒤 복귀...
-
정시면 현재 학교 이상 점수 받는게 운의 영향 클텐데 참...
-
5프로밖에안남아서오늘은즐거운오르비를즐길수없아어ㅜㅜ나없이도잘잇어조정삭인강도들어야되서이만고보고10시올게
-
문제 얼마나 안풀리면 유기때림? 걍 시간걸려도 쭉 악깡버함?
-
이정도로 보면 될듯 복잡하게 보면 이해하기 어려우니까 직관적으로..
-
젭알
-
8일차 목표 0
쓰기 귀차나
-
독재 와파 뚫기 1
가 아니라 저번에 한 번 정전 한 번 났는데 그 이후로 와이파이 설정이 바뀐 듯 나...
-
에어프라이에 돌린 어제 먹다 남은 치킨입니다 감사합니다
-
방금 지나가시던 어머님이 공주는 뛰지 않아 평범한 공주는 뛰어도 되지만 ㅇㅇ이는 더...
-
56166 -> 계명대 입학 2학년 1학기 끝나고 반수 42212 -> 정시 3떨...
-
일 하나 끝 0
하나 더 6시까지 하다가 6시 30분 과외 보강 가기
-
7등급인데 23수능 21번 원큐에 풀리는데 쉬운4점급인가
-
네?겉이 더 안좋다고요? ㅈㅅㅎㄴㄷ ㅠㅠ
-
속이안좋아요 1
토해낼수없어요
-
되면 읽음.
-
진짜 미치겠다 ㅈㄴ 친한사이도 아닌데 챙기는게 ㅈㄴ 부담스러움 엄빠는 나의...
-
자취 꿀팁6 13
디퓨저를 꼭 사십쇼 자취하면서 누군가 초대할 일이 생각보다 많은데(술먹은 동기...
-
뭐 어디문제생겻나…
-
흠... 6
....
-
ㅇㅇ
-
무슨 입시 카페가 아니라 맘카페 같네요...
-
건기식은 약국에서 많이 안팔지 않나
응 바꿔서 수학 4점 날렸어~
ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
근데 고쳐서 틀린게 한두개가 아님