씨티뱅크 [336667] · 쪽지

2014-10-28 00:33:49
조회수 567

영어 자작 빈칸추론문제 2문제 투척합니다 풀어주세요 ㅋㅋ (원전 지문출처:www.uefap.com)

게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/0004980393

  Q1:다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르시오

       As to goodness of character in general, Aristotle says that we start by having a capacity for it, but that it has to be developed by practice. How is it developed ? By doing virtuous acts. At first sight this looks like a vicious circle. Aristotle tells us that we become virtuous by doing virtuous acts, but how can we do virtuous acts unless we are already virtuous? Aristotle answers that we begin by doing acts which are objectively virtuous, without having a reflex knowledge of the acts and a deliberate choice of the acts as good, a choice resulting from an (                              ). For instance, a child may be told by its parents not to lie. It obeys without realizing perhaps the inherent goodness of telling the truth, and without having yet formed a idea of telling the truth; but the acts of truth-telling gradually forms, and as the process of education goes on, the child comes to realize that truth-telling is right in itself, and to choose to tell the truth for its own sake, as being the right thing to do. It is then virtuous in this respect. The accusation of the vicious circle is thus answered by the distinction between the acts which create the good disposition and the acts which flow from the good disposition once it has been created. Virtue itself is a disposition which has been developed out of a capacity by the proper exercise of that capacity


1) parental education

2) habitual disposition

3) real-life experience

4) socital exposure

5) virtuous obedience


Q2: 다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르시오

     The real purpose of scientific method is to (                                     ). There's not a mechanic or scientist or technician alive who hasn't suffered from that one so much that he's not instinctively on guard. That's the main reason why so much scientific and mechanical information sounds so dull and so cautious. If you get careless or go romanticizing scientific information, giving it a flourish here and there, Nature will soon make a complete fool out of you. It does it often enough anyway even when you don't give it opportunities. One must be extremely careful and rigidly logical when dealing with Nature: one logical slip and an entire scientific edifice comes tumbling down. One false deduction about the machine and you can get hung up indefinitely.


1) prevent people from distorting facts for their  own sake with ignoring objective truth

2) overcome difficulties furnished by nature that has been thought as unable to surmount

3) make people to acquire logical and critical thinking skills in order not to be fooled by others

4) let people become cautious and prudent when making judgements related to our nature

5) ensure Nature hasn't misled you into thinking you know something you don't know

0 XDK (+0)

  1. 유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.