문제 퀄 평가좀
게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00068898278
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
이거 땜에 멘탈갈려서 시험지 다 날림..
-
의대생은 아니고 공대생이라 2000명 증원하고 필수의료패키지 발표할 때 솔직히 뭘...
-
6모 + 9모 둘다 국영수 3합5이고 9모때 국어 커하찍어서 딱 2문제 틀리고...
-
죽어가는 오르비 한줄기 희망
-
한국어 좀 못하는 듯
-
능망념 봉망념 2
-
수능 60일 남았는데 아이폰16이 갖고싶다... 내가 ㅁ친거겠지..
-
사회교육과 생각중인데 필수인가요??..
-
쓰고 답이랑 비교하는거말고는 어케해야할지 감을못잡겟은 예시정답 뜯어서 문장구조같은거...
-
힘을 개방한 이원준쌤 미쳤다 쌤 사랑합니다....
-
9모 92인데 84뜸 ㅅㅂ 왜이리 빡빡하냐... 근데 21번 실수해서 3나옴 뭐지
-
수학 진짜 올리고 싶은데 국어 영어 탐구 진짜 조금씩만 하고(감 유지정도만)...
-
9모 수학 40분 남기고 100인데 서바 12회 56 2
????????????????????????????????????? 스탠다드...
-
??
-
에피츄가 수능 성적 상위 0.1퍼 인증하는 것 같던데 0.1퍼면 무조건 서울대 or...
-
고2 올라가면서 살지 말지 고민되네요
-
피드백 수용하시는 속도가 진짜 빠르시네 인현강 차별을 완전히 없앨 수는 없지만...
-
군수하는 사람인데요 오전 8시에일어나서 밥 먹고 점심 먹으면 12시인데 담배한대...
-
가끔 헷갈리거나 이해를 못할 단어가 등장하는데, 자주 나오는 단어가 있을까요?
-
수학 과탐은 걍 아무생각없이 풀어도 되던데 국어는 아무생각없으면 ㅈ되는듯
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ