문제 퀄 평가좀
게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00068898278
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
내 책상 2
수탐 이제 N제들어가는 ㅈ 허수의 책상....
-
드릴 개꿀잼이네 1
한 달 전에 드릴 처음 푸는 허수
-
지구 이제 실모 첨풀려고하는데 다는 못할거같고 셋중에 우선순위 정해서 순서대로...
-
요즘 경제 지문만 본 기분이라 법 공부 건너뛰고 과학 인문 예술 기술 경제만 파도 되나
-
철원 (1호선) 원주 (경강선, 경의중앙선)
-
10모 세계사 1
올해중에 제일 쉬운거같은데 만점표점 98은 무슨일인가요??
-
끝도없이 떨어지는 국어점수 시밯
-
피스파이스 과제 족보 답 구합니다.. 사례할게요
-
솔직히 18수능 말고 없는듯... 이때 시험지랑 등급컷 보면 진짜 표본 미친거 같음...
-
엄소연쌤이 공짜로 주심 군인이라 수익 안되서
-
You wanna? You wanna? You want a 1등급? You want...
-
학원에서 응시중인데 수학 너무 못봤네 이정도면 수능기준 1컷 88또는 그 이상일듯
-
심특은 뉴런 어려운 버전인가요
-
삼수는 필수 사수는 선택
-
생윤 질문 2
이거 왜 2번이 아닌지 설명해주실분… 답 1번입니다
-
수학 모고 3말 뜨는데 최저땜에 수학 2 목표중입니다 남은 한달동안 실모 주 2회는...
-
팩폭 부탁드려요 훈수 환영 늦깎이 N수생(feat. ADHD) 2
오랜만에 수능을 준비하게된 20대 중반입니다 저는 성격이 경쟁과 눈이 보이는 보상이...
-
거의 동어반복명제인데….
-
회당 비용이랑 1회 몇시간인지 혹시 아시는분 계실까요.. 학원 전화 계속 안받아서요...
-
영어가 불안정해서 1~3등급까지 extensively하게 왔다갔다합니다...
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ