Epigraph [919199] · MS 2019 (수정됨) · 쪽지

2024-03-29 02:41:12
조회수 2,793

와 진짜 뭐래는거야

게시글 주소: https://orbi.kr/00067712980

‘In sum, determination of whether a measure, which is not “indispensable”, may nevertheless be “necessary” within the contemplation of Article XX(d), involves in every case a process of weighing and balancing a series of factors which prominently include the contribution made by the compliance measure to the enforcement of the law or regulation at issue, the importance of the common interests or values protected by that law or regulation, and the accompanying impact of the law or regulation on imports or exports.’

‘It was clear to the Panel that a contracting party cannot justify a measure inconsistent with another GATT provision as “necessary” in terms of Article XX(d) if an alternative measure which it could reasonably be expected to employ and which is not inconsistent with other GATT provisions is available to it. By the same token, in cases where a measure consistent with other GATT provisions is not reasonably available, a contracting party is bound to use, among the measures reasonably available to it, that which entails the least degree of inconsistency with other GATT provisions’

다음에서 발췌

International Trade Law

이 자료는 저작권에 의해 보호됩니다.


rare-LCK rare-교대생 라봉이 rare-한국외국어대학교

0 XDK (+0)

  1. 유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.

  • 첫번째 댓글의 주인공이 되어보세요.