자작 영어 빈칸문제 하나 투척합니다^^(이번엔 연습하시라고 좀 어렵게 내려고 해봤는데 어떠실지 모르겠네요 ㅠㅠ)

      Q:다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것을
고르시오            

                 Any attempt to study government or
other human things must
(                                                          ). It is enough to
count the lawful votes that are cast to decide the election officially, but to
determine the meaning of an election, or of democratic elections in general, one
must ask whether the votes were given mindfully or cast in ignorance or
somewhere between. Addressing the problem of definitions by recognizing a
standard toward which the diversity of actual instances ought to strive is often
called teleology. But while nature demands that the average acorn become
an oak tree, nature provides no such clear standards for discerning the
telos, or purpose,
of human action. Plato and Aristotle show that in human things average and
standard do not coincide, that human life requires both, and that the choice
between them will typically be disputed. Social science criticizes teleology by
assuming the superiority of its own standard of clarity, understood as
definitions not open to dispute. But in human things definitions are always
subject to uncertainty and dispute; one cannot avoid uncertainty by simply
setting it aside and declaring it outside the model.

1) have to be prudent and opened
to criticism or diverse opinion in order to fulfill one's work
successfully due to lack of fixed answer

2) be keen and objective while assessing the
others by adamantly maintaining what seems to be right

3) patiently suffer the vagueness and
indeterminacy arising from the potential for dissatisfaction with the
average

4) perform their work in concessive way and
required to find the point of negotiation in the best way for the mutual
benefits

5) find the way that can arouse the
greatest happiness of greatest number of people and be alert of true intentions