잠 줄여가면서 열심히 만든 자작 빈칸추론 문제입니다 풀어주세요 ㅠㅠ(무플은 싫어요 ㅎㅎ)

Q:다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오
         The distinction between the useful and the valuable is of great philosophical importance and requires further explanation. One way of explaining it is this. The activities of any individual can be divided into two broad categories-work and leisure. There are other distinctions with which this can be (but ought not to be) confused. The distinction between work and leisure is not that between the dreary and the pleasurable, for instance. Some people find their work a source of great personal satisfaction and others find that leisure activities and pall. Nor is it a distinction between employment and non-employment. The possessor of vast inherited wealth, who is not employed, is working, in the relevant sense, when he keeps track of his millions or draws more money from the bank. Similarly, unemployed people in receipt of social security of working, in this same sense, when they stand in line to collect their welfare benefit or fill in the forms bureaucracy requires. Therefore, the distincton between work and leisure, then is really (                                           ).

1) differentiated by whether it is forced by other person of high authority or by voluntary wills
2) between those activities which are indispensible to living and those which make living meaningful 
3) a difference between paid work for financial rewards or just voluntary works for self-complacence
4) differing greatly from people to people depending on personal criteria they possess in their minds
5) a question with unconfined answer that can possibly differ greatly from provided circumstances

Q: 다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르시오
          Ignoring the importance of style is not the main fault in the assumption of essential purposiveness, however, the most fundamental error that has is occurring in our judgement is the (                                      ). The difference between the categorial and the relative is most easily illustrated by judgements of sizes. 'Large' and 'small' can be thought as contraries. A thing cannot be both large and small, it is easily understand. But this is a false. A large mouse can be a small animal; a large raspberry can be a small fruit. 'Large' and 'small' are essentially relative judgements, which is to say, there are judgements relative to the sorts of things they qualify. So too, with ends and means. These are relative judgements. Something can be a means relative to one thing and an end relative to another.

 1) stereotypical minds ignoring the designated criteria of rational classification
 2) our unawareness of relative nature of sizes that is differing from other cases
 3) people are naturally biased by their own conviction while making judgements
 4) the partial minds of people who are only willing to see what they want to see
 5) implicit supposition that the distinction between 'end' and 'means' is   categorial

 
Q:다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르시오
 
                Something of the same sort can be said about television with respect to the second criterion of novelty outlined above – impact on social and political forms of life. There is, as it seems to me, consequence of television (                                             ). Family life is greatly altered in comparison with times past; this is true, which is an indispensible part of side-effect accompanied by modernizations. But television follows social trends; it does not set them. In this respect there is a reason to contrast television with the slightly earlier form of mass communication which preceded it, namely radio. A case can be made for saying that radio, which was initially regarded as a medium of entertainment, in fact altered the character of political life of politician in United States. In particular it ended the role of the public meeting and the place and importance of political oratory within it. One of the towering early masters of radio for political purposes was former president FDR. His notable Secretary, Francis Perkins, recalls how the relationship with voters was subtly altered by this medium.
 
1) is more crucial and notable in human history in contemporary times compared to past
2) can possibly have a considerably devastating effects on our society if it is misused by someone
3) has no more meaning than just as a neutral medium of facts and events occurred in our world
4) is seriously inclined to the opinion and ideas of specific interest groups rather than real facts
5) has no aspects that is a clear counterpart to the social and political significance of urbanization

Q:다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르시오
      More information is indispensible part of new desires, in other words, new needs. Let's pretend I knew nothing of Chinese food until yesterday, say, but having discovered it, eating Chinese is added to the list of my desires. Now it is important to note that the value of new technology (                                                                     ). It is not as though desires conveniently spring into existence at the same time as new inventions. The availability of technology has the effect of stimulating new desires. I can come to want things not, as it were, directly but because I discover that there are means of accomplishing them. I never thought of holidaying in the Caribbean, let us say, until I discovered the availability of relatively inexpensive flights. Now that it is possible to travel long distances easily and cheaply, I come to want to do it.
 

1) inevitable requires comprehensive amount of informations and desires
2) requires an rudiments of already-existing technologies to get bloomed
3) does not depend on the fortuitous and arbitrary advent of new desires
4) depends much on the seemingly unrelated surrounding circumstances and situations
5) get vitalized through the constant subjugation of hazard and difficulties
 
Q:  다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 알맞은 것을 고르시오
 
     Stock's point can be applied directly to technology. In so far as the benefit of technology arises from its usefulness, it loses its value when something better takes into accounts, and if we pursue this line of thought, the ideal world would be one in which technology is of no benefit at all. Because we do not need to use it. To regard technology as essentially purposeful, then, is to make the mistake of supposing that usefulness is valuable in and for itself. It is not; 'the useful' is of consequence only in so far as it is serves something else. Assessing real benefits, certainly, requires us to pursue a chain of means to ends. but this chain of assessment only produces an answer if, somewhere, it comes to an end. Where is the end to be found? The answer is that we must assess the advantages of technological innovation (                                                ).

1) based on the impact it has posed on the other technological innovations
2) grounded on the level of mutual interactions with other technologies
3) by judging through the criteria of current feasiblity of that theory or idea
4) in terms of the value of the ends to which it is a useful means
5) whether or not it can be used in a pragmatic way in our life

Q:다음 글의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르시오